Water Quality Information

The health and well-being of Sailors, their families and civilians are the Navy’s top priority, including those assigned to overseas Navy installations.

CNRSE’s drinking water systems comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local safe drinking water regulations, Executive Orders, and Navy Policy by performing water quality monitoring (including some or all of the following based on system type: bacteria, lead, copper, disinfection by-products, and other chemicals) and providing customers an annual Consumer Confidence Report as well as investigating and resolving customer complaints.

Other CNRSE policy requirements include Distribution System Sanitary Survey reviews and programs for cross-connection control, backflow prevention, operation and maintenance, and unidirectional flushing. All these programs are designed to ensure that safe drinking water is delivered to every consumer.

“Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command – PFAS Sampling Results”

https://www.navfac.navy.mil/Divisions/Environmental/Products-and-Services/Environmental-Restoration/SOUTHEAST/

Water Quality (Consumer Confidence ) Reports by Installation

NAS Corpus Christi

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Corpus Christi 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS JRB Fort Worth
PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB Fort Worth 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

Naval Station Guantanamo Bay

PDF: NS Guantanamo Bay 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Guantanamo Bay 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Guantanamo Bay 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Guantanamo Bay 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: Naval Station Guantanamo Bay 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: Naval Station Guantanamo Bay 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: Naval Station Guantanamo Bay 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NCBC Gulfport

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NCBC Gulfport 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Jacksonville
PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Jacksonville 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Key West
PDF: NAS Key West 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Key West 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NSB Kings Bay
PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSB Kings Bay 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Kingsville
PDF: NAS Kingsville 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: Naval Auxiliary Landing Field Orange Grove 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Kingsville 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

Naval Station Mayport
PDF: NS Mayport 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NS Mayport 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Meridian
PDF: NAS Meridian 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Meridian 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NSA Mid-South

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Mid-South 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS JRB New Orleans
PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS JRB New Orleans 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NSA Panama City

PDF: NSA Panama City 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Panama City 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Panama City 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Panama City 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Panama City 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NSA Panama City 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Pensacola
PDF: NAS Pensacola Saufley Field 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Pensacola Corry Station 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

NAS Whiting Field
PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2023 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2022 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2021 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2020 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2019 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2018 Consumer Confidence Report

PDF: NAS Whiting Field 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

What are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and where do they come from?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of thousands of man-made chemicals. PFAS have been used in a variety of industries and consumer products around the globe, including in the U.S., since the 1940s. PFAS have been used to make coatings and products that are used as oil and water repellents for carpets, clothing, paper packaging for food, and cookware. They are also contained in some foams (aqueous film-forming foam or AFFF) currently used for fighting petroleum fires at airfields and in industrial fire suppression processes. PFAS chemicals are persistent in the environment and some are persistent in the human body – meaning they do not break down and they can accumulate over time.
Is there a regulation for PFAS in drinking water?
On April 10, 2024, the US EPA established MCLs for a subset of PFAS chemicals.

Chemical	Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
PFOA	4.0 ppt
PFOS	4.0 ppt
PFNA	10 ppt
PFHxS	10 ppt
HFPO-DA (GenX chemicals)	10 ppt
Mixture of two or more: PFNA, PFHxS, HFPO-DA, and PFBS	Hazard Index of 1

EPA requires implementation of sampling in accordance with the new MCLs within three years of the publication date and implementation of any required treatment within five years.
These limits did not apply for the 2023 calendar year because they had not been published. However, the DoD proactively promulgated policies to monitor drinking water for PFAS at all service owned and operated water systems at a minimum of every two years. The DoD policy states that if water sampling results confirm that drinking water contains PFOA and PFOS at individual or combined concentrations greater than the 2016 EPA health advisory (HA) level of 70 ppt, water systems must take immediate action to reduce exposure to PFOS or PFAS. For levels less than 70 ppt but above the 4 ppt level (draft at the time of policy publication), DoD committed to planning for implementation of the levels once EPA’s published MCLs take effect.

Has NS Mayport tested its water for PFAS?
Most recently, samples were collected from NS Mayport in March 2024.   We are pleased to report that drinking water testing results were below the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) for all 29 PFAS compounds covered by the sampling method, including PFOA and PFOS. The results are provided in the attached results report. This means that PFAS were not detected in your water system. In accordance with DoD policy, the water system will continue to collect semi-annual samples for PFAS until results are below the MRL for two consecutive sampling events and then every two years for your continued protection.

NS Mayport - 2024 PFAS Sampling Results:
/Portals/83/cnrse/Documents/FY2024 Mayport Event 1 PFAS_533 and 537_1_ Sample Results Memo.pdf?ver=xnXaJZQpT_AzNv4Ast3eYQ%3d%3d

NS Mayport Update: Most recently, samples were collected from NS Mayport in September 2024.   We are pleased to report that drinking water testing results were below the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) for all 29 PFAS compounds covered by the sampling method, including PFOA and PFOS. The results are provided in the attached results report. This means that PFAS were not detected in your water system. In accordance with DoD policy, since results have been below the MRL for two consecutive sampling events, per the current DOD policy, the sampling frequency will return to the 2-year cycle which will occur next during 2025.

NS Mayport - 2024 Updated PFAS Sampling Results:
/Portals/83/ns_mayport/Documents/Environmental_Support/PFAS/FY2024 Mayport Event 2 PFAS_533 and 537_1_ Sample Results Memo.pdf?ver=Y26TeL1se4r1X_0kiNssAQ%3d%3d

Has NAS Pensacola tested its water for PFAS?
Most recently, samples were collected from NAS Pensacola in August 2024. We are informing you that 7 of the 29 PFAS compounds covered by the sampling methods were detected above the method reporting limit (MRL). The results are provided in the attached results report. EPA does not have a HA or MCL for all of these compounds at this time. PFOA and PFOS were detected above the new MCLs. For regulated PFAS above the new MCL and in accordance with DoD policy, Navy is coordinating with DoD to plan and program operational controls or additional treatment to ensure the drinking water meets the MCLs as soon as practicable at all of our impacted installations. There is no immediate cause for concern, but we will continue to monitor the drinking water closely. PFNA, PFBS, PFHxS and Gen X were not detected above the new MCLs. As the regulated chemicals were below the new MCLs, there is no immediate cause for concern, but we will continue to monitor the drinking water closely. In accordance with DoD policy, the water system will continue to collect semi-annual samples for PFAS until results are below the MRL for two consecutive sampling events and then every two years thereafter as long as the results remain below the MRL.

NAS Pensacola (Corry Station) - 2024 PFAS Sampling Results:
/Portals/83/nas_pensacola/Documents/FY2024 Corry Station PFAS_533 and 537_1_ Sample Results Memo 2nd Half.pdf?ver=wiP64kG3tUBzl-jYKa8EYg%3d%3d

Has NALF Goliad tested its water for PFAS?
Most recently, samples were collected from NALF Goliad in August 2024.   We are pleased to report that drinking water testing results were below the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) for all 29 PFAS compounds covered by the sampling method, including PFOA and PFOS. The results are provided in the attached results report. This means that PFAS were not detected in your water system. In accordance with DoD policy, since results have been below the MRL for two consecutive sampling events, per the current DOD policy, the sampling frequency will return to the 2-year cycle which will occur next during 2025.

NALF Pensacola Goliad - 2024 PFAS Sampling Results:
/Portals/83/nas_corpus_christi/Documents/Environmental_Support/FY2024 Goliad Event 2nd Half PFAS_533 and 537_1_ Sample Results Memo.pdf?ver=BXkMDF_xBMWbredVHcMusg%3d%3d

Has NALF Orange Grove tested its water for PFAS?
Most recently, samples were collected from NALF Orange Grove in August 2024.   We are pleased to report that drinking water testing results were below the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) for all 29 PFAS compounds covered by the sampling method, including PFOA and PFOS. The results are provided in the attached results report. This means that PFAS were not detected in your water system. In accordance with DoD policy, since results have been below the MRL for two consecutive sampling events, per the current DOD policy, the sampling frequency will return to the 2-year cycle which will occur next during 2025.

NALF Orange Grove - 2024 PFAS Sampling Results:
/Portals/83/nas_kingsville/Documents/Environmental_Support/PFAS/FY2024 Orange Grove Event 1 PFAS_533 and 537_1_ Sample Results Memo 2nd Event.pdf?ver=zqqZki4kfUg2AToTrqUkjw%3d%3d

Google Translation Disclaimer

Google Translate, a third party service provided by Google, performs all translations directly and dynamically.
Commander, Navy Region Southeast, cnrse.cnic.navy.mil has no control over the features, functions, or performance of the Google Translate service.
The automated translations should not be considered exact and should be used only as an approximation of the original English language content.
This service is meant solely for the assistance of limited English-speaking users of the website.
Commander, Navy Region Southeast, cnrse.cnic.navy.mil does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of any information translated.
Some items cannot be translated, including but not limited to image buttons, drop down menus, graphics, photos, or portable document formats (pdfs).
Commander, Navy Region Southeast, cnrse.cnic.navy.mil does not directly endorse Google Translate or imply that it is the only language translation solution available to users.
All site visitors may choose to use similar tools for their translation needs. Any individuals or parties that use Commander, Navy Region Southeast, cnrse.cnic.navy.mil content in translated form, whether by Google Translate or by any other translation services, do so at their own risk.
IE users: Please note that Google Translate may not render correctly when using Internet Explorer. Users are advised to use MS Edge, Safari, Chrome, or Firefox browser to take full advantage of the Google Translate feature.
The official text of content on this site is the English version found on this website. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in translated text, refer to the English version on this website, it is the official version.